I don't use the chain when I start a magic circle, just make the circle with the yarn over my fingers and start with the first row after the chain.When you first start with the magic circle it will look loose and sloppy. After you get the first round done and pull the magic circle ti tighten the circle it will look different.
The other thought I had is that most patterns using the magic circle have a foundation round of sc or dc that hold the shape of the magic circle. This pattern does not.
Most such blankets are worked in US dc/UK tr.I did the US treble, the pattern as shown does not indicate where it was written UK or US, and I do not know where she is located to make that determination, if it is UK - it would be a dc in US and would not curl as it is doing, I just quickly did a sample to give her an idea of what it might look like for the first row. Indicating three of the stitches with spaces in between with doing the stitches directly into the magic circle.
Thanks for the photo. To me it looks like you just need to work another round. Same as J-J I thought it might be UK tc and with this photo think it definitely uses UK terminology. One thing you can check is does it have any sc in it? I can't say with certainty but I think sc is not used in UK terms. If you share the name of the publication it's from someone might know or be able to find out where it was published.
And wow, how is this a granny square??!!? I have a very narrow old-fashioned definition or thought process in my head for that term/pattern. Semantics? Regional bias? S t r e t c h those brain cells, self!Pattern is from UK:
It is a variation on the basic granny.And wow, how is this a granny square??!!? I have a very narrow old-fashioned definition or thought process in my head for that term/pattern. Semantics? Regional bias? S t r e t c h those brain cells, self!